Mapping human vulnerability to climate change
MAR. 3, 2011
First global map suggests climate change will have
greatest impact on the populations least responsible
for causing the problem
Researchers already study how various species of
plants and animals migrate
in response to climate change. Now,
Jason Samson, a PhD candidate in
McGill University’s Department of Natural
Resource Sciences, has taken
the innovative step of using the same analytic tools to measure
the impact of climate change on human populations.
Samson and fellow researchers combined climate change
data with censuses covering close to 97 per-cent of the
world’s population in order to forecast potential changes in
local populations for 2050.
plants and animals migrate
in response to climate change. Now,
Jason Samson, a PhD candidate in
McGill University’s Department of Natural
Resource Sciences, has taken
the innovative step of using the same analytic tools to measure
the impact of climate change on human populations.
Samson and fellow researchers combined climate change
data with censuses covering close to 97 per-cent of the
world’s population in order to forecast potential changes in
local populations for 2050.
Samson’s team found that if populations continue to
increase at the expected rates, those who are likely to
be the most vulnerable to climate change are the
people living in low-latitude, hot regions of the world,
places like central South America, the Arabian Peninsula
and much of Africa. In these areas, a relatively small
increase in temperature will have serious consequences
on a region’s ability to sustain a growing population.”
It makes sense that the low latitude tropical regions
should be more vulnerable
because the people there already experience extremely
hot conditions which make agriculture challenging.
An increase in temperature over the next few decades
will only make their lives more difficult in a
variety of ways,” says Samson.
increase at the expected rates, those who are likely to
be the most vulnerable to climate change are the
people living in low-latitude, hot regions of the world,
places like central South America, the Arabian Peninsula
and much of Africa. In these areas, a relatively small
increase in temperature will have serious consequences
on a region’s ability to sustain a growing population.”
It makes sense that the low latitude tropical regions
should be more vulnerable
because the people there already experience extremely
hot conditions which make agriculture challenging.
An increase in temperature over the next few decades
will only make their lives more difficult in a
variety of ways,” says Samson.
This contrasts with Samson’s predictions about the impact
of climate change on human populations in the high-latitude
more temperate zones of the world, where the temperature
change is expected to be greater. Because the spread of human
populations along with their activities are already more
constrained by the cooler conditions in these regions,
the researchers expect that climate change will have
less of an impact on people living in these areas.
of climate change on human populations in the high-latitude
more temperate zones of the world, where the temperature
change is expected to be greater. Because the spread of human
populations along with their activities are already more
constrained by the cooler conditions in these regions,
the researchers expect that climate change will have
less of an impact on people living in these areas.
The study also points to clear inequities in the causes
and consequences of climate change: the countries
that have contributed the least to climate change,
based on their average per-capita carbon dioxide
emissions, are nevertheless predicted to be the most
vulnerable to its impacts. “Take Somalia for instance,”
suggests Samson.”Because it’s so hot there, it’s already
very difficult to grow things, and it will only become
more difficult if the temperature rises. It’s also clear
that Somalia is not a big contributor of greenhouse
gas to the atmosphere. Now thanks to this map,
we have concrete quantitative evidence of the
disparity between the causes and the consequences
of climate change at a national level.”
and consequences of climate change: the countries
that have contributed the least to climate change,
based on their average per-capita carbon dioxide
emissions, are nevertheless predicted to be the most
vulnerable to its impacts. “Take Somalia for instance,”
suggests Samson.”Because it’s so hot there, it’s already
very difficult to grow things, and it will only become
more difficult if the temperature rises. It’s also clear
that Somalia is not a big contributor of greenhouse
gas to the atmosphere. Now thanks to this map,
we have concrete quantitative evidence of the
disparity between the causes and the consequences
of climate change at a national level.”
Samson anticipates this data could be useful for decision
makers around the world in the ongoing international
negotiations around climate change.”
makers around the world in the ongoing international
negotiations around climate change.”
The research was funded by the Natural
Sciences and Engineering Council of Canada (NSERC).
Sciences and Engineering Council of Canada (NSERC).
On online version of the article was recently published
by the journal Global Ecology and Biogeography
by the journal Global Ecology and Biogeography
For an abstract of the article:
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1466-8238.2010.00632.x/abstract
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1466-8238.2010.00632.x/abstract
A copy of the full article is available on request.
#supercarrinho @supercarrinho
Nenhum comentário:
Postar um comentário
super carrinho. faça as idéias rodarem aqui também.
obrigada pela participação no debate.